Christina Ricci on The Fountainhead

Christina RicciIn an interview with Movieline Magazine from 2001, Christina Ricci mentions that she’s an admirer of The Fountainhead and would like to remake the movie:

Q: What’s your favorite novel? A: The Fountainhead because the writing is so beautiful.
Q: What about The Catcher in the Rye? A: I hate The Catcher in the Rye. It’s so whiny and incredibly self-involved. The fact that it was supposed to represent what we were going through in our teen years – I was just like, fuck you. I can take responsibility for my emotions and actions. […]
Q: If you could have three wishes connected to the movies, what would they be? A: I’d want to remake The Fountainhead. I’d like to run a studio. I want to have the capacity and ability to make films – I don’t have it right now.
Q: Would you say you have a large ego? A: Yes.

Check out the full interview.
PS. In case you didn’t notice, that’s a copy of The Fountainhead she’s holding, in this poster. It looks as if she was approached about participating in a pro-reading poster campaign, and she chose The Fountainhead as the theme for her poster. Copies of this poster are available for purchase online. -Editor

TOC Spring Conference in Nevada

The Objectivist Center has announced its Spring Conference, to be held on April 17, 2004 in Las Vegas, Nevada. From the announcement:

Join the Objectivist Center for a weekend in Las Vegas to experience the wild side of Capitalism and explore the values that achievement and business require. In addition to social and entertainment opportunities, the program highlights include:

  • Attorney and former law professor Bruce Dalcher assessing the PATRIOT act
  • Barbara Lehman, chief marketing strategist with HMI Advertising,
    explaining the art of entrepreneurial living

  • TOC Washington Director Ed Hudgins diagnosing the Republicans’ betrayal of small government
  • TOC Director of Programs William Thomas weighing the ethical state of corporate America

The conference brochure and registration materials will be available soon.

World Socialists Onto Greenspan's Tactics

In a recent editorial, the World Socialists Web Site predicts a deepening U.S. fiscal crisis ? which is nothing particularly new.
It is a kick, however, to see them grouse so loudly about Alan Greenspan’s admiration for Ayn Rand’s ideas:

As chairman of the Federal Reserve, Greenspan has to at least give the impression of political neutrality, claiming to base himself on the findings of economic analysis. But, as his history shows, he is flesh of one with some of the most aggressive defenders of the ?free market? and private property and wealth within the American ruling class.
These views were clearly set out in an article published in 1966 defending the gold standard as the real basis of all finance, and subsequently reprinted in the book Capitalism, the Unknown Ideal by extreme right-wing philosopher Ayn Rand. According to Greenspan, ?chronic deficit spending? was the hallmark of the welfare state, while the welfare state itself was ?nothing more than a mechanism by which governments confiscate the wealth of the productive members of society to support a wide variety of welfare schemes.?
Asked in 1993 if he still agreed with the conclusions of his article, Greenspan replied: ?Absolutely.? That basic agreement seems to have been underlined once again by his insistence that the answer to the growing fiscal crisis in the US is to make permanent the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy while slashing domestic government spending.

Keep reading, if you’re not scared of scare quotes.

Alan Greenspan Cites Math Gap

Federal Reserve chairman (and former Ayn Rand associate) Alan Greenspan warns a Senate committee about the “math gap”:

Alan Greenspan has added a new twist to the ongoing debate on jobs outsourcing. Last week, the U.S. Federal Reserve chairman told the Senate Banking Committee that the real threat to the standard of living in the United States came not from jobs leaving for cheaper Asian locations. The bigger worry, he said, was a drop in U.S. educational standards.
U.S. students ranked 19th in a 1999 study of mathematical ability among eighth-graders in 38 countries. Four years earlier, as fourth-graders, the same cohort of U.S. students had ranked seventh. Students from Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Japan completed the Top 5 list of 1999. China and India did not participate in the study.
“What will ultimately determine” the “standard of living of this country is the skill of the people,” Greenspan told the Senate committee. “We do something wrong, which obviously people in Singapore, Hong Kong, Korea and Japan do far better. Teaching in these strange, exotic places seems for some reason to be far better than we can do it.”

Also amusing is Andy Mukherjee’s observation that because of the education system in Singapore, Greenspan’s own career choices might not have been possible in that country.

John Stossel Credits Ayn Rand

The Atlas Society reports that the Daily Princetonian ? the Princeton University student newspaper ? carries an interview with John Stossel, the famous investigative reporter for ABC News. From the inteview:

When I struggling with these ideas, I was reading the liberal press, which was in love with the welfare state, and it didn’t really make sense to me. And the conservative press seemed to want to bring police into our bedrooms.
Then I discovered something called Reason Magazine, based out of Los Angeles, which just made sense. Suddenly there were these people who grappled with these ideas before me who understood them better than I did and had a real intellectual foundation for it. My favorite writer there was the editor ? a woman named Virginia Postrel ? who I assumed was some 60 year old lady writing brilliant stuff. But she turned out to be about 10 years behind me at Princeton … Ayn Rand and a book by Charles Murray called In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government have also influenced me.

Stossel?s hard-hitting TV specials and reports on the show ?20/20? are grounded explicitly in a libertarian philosophy. And among those whom he acknowledges in his new bestseller, Give Me a Break, is The Objectivist Center Executive Director David Kelley.

Friend of America on Norwegian Television

Last year, Atlasphere member Fredrik Norman helped found an organization called Norwegian Friends of America. This past Saturday, he was interviewed on a Norwegian talk show about his views on the subject.
From his interview:

Knut Olsen: Is Bush worth dying for?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: Hopefully we won’t have to die because of Bush. Hopefully, we also won’t have to die because of Osama bin Laden, terrorists and tyrants — and that’s what the Americans are trying to save us from.
Knut Olsen: But is he worth fighting for?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: We should fight for ourselves and our own interests, and they are the same as American interests: liberty, democracy and human rights. This, we shall fight for, hopefully together with our allies.
Knut Olsen: Do you personally support Bush’s foreign policy?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: Which parts of Bush’s foreign policy I do or don’t support, I find rather irrelevant…
Knut Olsen: But is it the official stance of the Norwegian Friends of America that you do so?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: We support America’s moral right to defend her interests, because we believe those interests are the same as Norway’s interests. American interests are liberty, democracy and human rights, and those are also Norwegian interests.

Fredrik stayed remarkably cool, articulate, and principled throughout his on-air grilling. Read a transcription of the full interview at FredrikNorman.com. Via Instapundit.

Hudgins on George Washington's Legacy

Ed Hudgins, TOC Washington Director, writes in his latest Report from the Front on the first U.S. President’s political and moral legacy:

Washington?s achievements reflected his outstanding moral character. He set for himself the highest standards in everything he did and thus became exemplar for his associates and his fellow countrymen. Indeed, when he presided over the Constitutional Convention, he spoke little. It was his example — the fact that the other delegates were in the presence of Washington — that kept those delegates on their best behavior and inspired them to look to the good of the country.
But Washington was not some ever-frowning moralist; he enjoyed life, whether at a dance or dinner party or just riding through his beloved Mt. Vernon estate.

Read the full article…

Ridpath on George Washington's Virtues

ARI op-ed columnist John Ridpath has written a moving tribute to the first of American presidents, titled “America Needs a Leader Like George Washington.”

On Presidents’ Day, Americans have an opportunity to reflect on its Presidents?past and present?and particularly on those who have been great leaders. History is replete with examples of charismatic power-lusting “leaders” directing mindless and obedient legions on campaigns of suppression and destruction. But America’s great leaders have been different.
America has often been blessed, in times of crisis, with principled, moral leaders, directing this nation against history’s tyrants and in pursuit of freedom and the rights of man.
Now, once again facing a crisis, America searches for great leadership. Awash in a morass of moral compromise, poll-taking, and hesitation to offend world opinion, Americans desperately seize on any hint of strength, of moral certainty, of a refusal to swim with others in the swamp of compromise, empty rhetoric and threats that now passes for “leadership” in Washington, D.C.
Where can Americans turn, to witness the spectacle of great leadership?
On Presidents’ Day, this country should look, for inspiration and conviction, to America’s greatest leader, George Washington.
Washington, in company with the other Founding Fathers of America, was a son of the 18th century Enlightenment. His vision of America was one of responsible, independent, free, and hard-working citizens, prospering in a system of political and economic freedom. He believed that America would become a beacon of liberty and justice to men everywhere.

Read the full article….

Environmentalists Prove Ayn Rand Right

In an article for Australia’s The Age, Sixties environmental activist Patrick Moore discusses the changes that have come over the environmental movement in the past forty years. He begins:

I was raised in the tiny fishing and logging village of Winter Harbour on the north-west tip of Vancouver Island, where salmon spawned in the streams of the adjoining Pacific rainforest.
In school, I discovered ecology, and realised that through science I could gain insight into the natural beauties I had known as a child. In the late 1960s I was transformed into a radical environmental activist.
A ragtag group of activists and I sailed a leaky old halibut boat across the North Pacific to block the last US hydrogen bomb tests under President Richard Nixon. In the process I co-founded Greenpeace.

Ayn Rand and Peter Schwartz make a cameo:

At the beginning of the modern environmental movement, Ayn Rand published Return of the Primitive, which contained an essay by Peter Schwartz “The Anti-Industrial Revolution.” In it, he warned that the new movement’s agenda was anti-science, anti-technology, and anti-human.
At the time, he didn’t get a lot of attention from the mainstream media or the public.
Environmentalists were often able to produce arguments that sounded reasonable, while doing good deeds like saving whales and making the air and water cleaner.
But now the chickens have come home to roost. The environmentalists’ campaign against biotechnology in general, and genetic engineering in particular, has exposed their intellectual and moral bankruptcy.
By adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards a technology with so many potential benefits for humankind and the environment, they have lived up to Schwartz’s predictions.
They have alienated themselves from scientists, intellectuals and internationalists.
It seems inevitable that the media and the public will, in time, see the insanity of their position.

Read the whole article for more interesting stories from a former environmental activist.
UPDATE: Michelle Fram-Cohen points out an historical inaccuracy in Moore’s account of Rand’s book:

The facts are that in 1971 Rand published a collection of her essays under the title The New Left: The Anti Industrial Revolution. This was also the title of one essay in the book. Return of the Primitive was published in 1999, and is an expanded edition of The New Left, edited with an introduction by Peter Schwartz. It includes Schwartz?s essay “The Return of the Primitive,” which he used for the title of the new edition.