Retail Clothing Entrepreneur Steve Shore

From a recent article in Newsday about business partners Steve Shore and Barry Prevor:

Summer 1979: Two teenage boys stand on top of a van at the Roosevelt Raceway flea market, shouting into a megaphone. They exhort customers to buy the $1 T-shirts spread out on a tarp at the foot of the van. A crowd gathers, snapping up the bargain T’s.
June 2005: Forty-somethings Steve Shore and Barry Prevor stand in the middle of their Broadway Mall store, Steve & Barry’s University Sportswear. Instead of megaphones, they advertise with graphic blue and yellow signs. Instead of tarps, the selling floor is laid with wood. Their T-shirts are now $8.
In the past 26 years, these childhood friends have quietly built a national mini-empire of stores that deliver basic clothing at what they call “ridiculous” prices. Nothing in the chain’s 70 stores costs more than $10 – from women’s boot-cut jeans to kids’ shorts to heavyweight hoodie sweatshirts emblazoned with a Top 10 college name.
The Port Washington-based company is relatively unknown here in its own backyard. That’s largely a function of strategy: Prevor and Shore keep costs down by finding very inexpensive real estate, often in second- and third-tier malls around the country. Their growth has been concentrated in Midwestern and Southern states.
But now Steve & Barry’s sits on the cusp of explosive growth, with a just-signed lease for its first Manhattan location and plans to double the number of stores over the next year. And they’re not shy about saying they’re creating a revolution in retail, thanks to a formula of rock-bottom prices and smart-looking shops.

The article continues:

Early on, they established a price ceiling of $10 and a reputation as “the good guys,” especially for budget-conscious consumers. For Shore, in particular, this is a deeply felt mission.
He leans forward, eyes shining with intensity as he discusses the company’s pricing policy. “Our slogan can’t be ‘We won’t screw you,’ because that just can’t be a slogan. But they [customers] know they can come to us and not be taken advantage of.”
Still, he and Prevor bristle at the notion that their prices spring from some sense of charity or altruism.
“I’m an Ayn Rand fan, and I don’t like the word ‘altruistic,'” Prevor said. “It’s more that we understand that our self-interest is tied in with our customers’ self-interest.”
Prevor and Shore clam up when the subject turns specifically to their self-interest. After a whispered conference, they offer a tidbit: Sales are in the nine figures, somewhere between $100 million and $1 billion.
But they won’t reveal their annual profits or profit margins. (As a private company, they’re not required to disclose that information.) They simply say they’re doing very well, thanks for asking.

See the full article for more information.

Ayn Rand Analyzed at Theory of Constraints Conf

From Atlasphere member Michael Round:
The Theory of Constraints for Education will have its 8th International Conference in Seattle, Washington, USA, August 11 – August 14.
The Theory of Constraints, made popular in industry by way of the novel The Goal, is an improvement philosophy based on simple yet powerful thinking processes Socratically derived in a non-contradictory manner.
The Theory of Constraints for Education applies these thinking processes to develop clarity and conceptual understanding in the student.
2004 TOCFE Virtual Conference presentations included a logical analysis of Francisco’s “Moral Meaning of Money” speech, in addition to an analysis of Anthem and Jonathan Livingston Seagull.
Michael Round
USA Director
Theory of Constraints for Education

Surviving a Crisis by Thinking for Yourself

The new article “Question Authorities” at Wired Magazine raises some interesting points, not the least of which is the value of thinking for oneself:

For more than four years – steadily, seriously, and with the unsentimental rigor for which we love them – civil engineers have been studying the destruction of the World Trade Center towers, sifting the tragedy for its lessons. And it turns out that one of the lessons is: Disobey authority. In a connected world, ordinary people often have access to better information than officials do.
Proof can be found in the 298-page draft report issued in April by the National Institute on Standards and Technology called Occupant Behavior, Egress, and Emergency Communications. (In layman’s terms, that’s who got out of the buildings, how they got out, and why.) It’s an eloquent document, in many ways. The report confirms a chilling fact that was widely covered in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. After both buildings were burning, many calls to 911 resulted in advice to stay put and wait for rescue. Also, occupants of the towers had been trained to use the stairs, not the elevators, in case of evacuation.
Fortunately, this advice was mostly ignored. According to the engineers, use of elevators in the early phase of the evacuation, along with the decision to not stay put, saved roughly 2,500 lives. This disobedience had nothing to do with panic. The report documents how evacuees stopped to help the injured and assist the mobility-impaired, even to give emotional comfort. Not panic but what disaster experts call reasoned flight ruled the day.

Keep reading for more info. Found via InstaPundit, who also has additional thoughts of his own worth reading.

New Zealanders Come to Shania Twain's Defense

From a press release by the New Zealand Libertarianz:
RMA Surely Don’t Impress Shania Much
“Shania Twain’s proposed home doesn’t impress Queenstown’s busybodies, but their personal views should not be the business of law,” says Libertarianz spokesman to deregulate the environment, Peter Cresswell. “Unfortunately the RMA has given them that power. It doesn’t say to property owners ‘Come on Over,’ instead it screams ‘I’m Gonna Getcha Good’!”
“The Resource Management Act (RMA) has given unelected power to busybodies who now consider they have rights over other people’s property,” says Cresswell. “It seems nothing will allow Twain’s house past Andrew Henderson, the planning stickybeak from CivicCorp who rejected the application and Julian Haworth, head busybody from the Upper Clutha Environmental Society, who between them have decided that ‘the complex would not be in harmony with the surrounding landscape,’ and ‘man-made mounds to screen the house’ were ‘not appropriate.'”
“I guess even a camouflage net wouldn’t have satisfied these meddling arseholes,” says Cresswell. “Remind me again how the RMA is “permissive” as Owen McShane has called it, and “far-sighted environmental legislation” as Nick Smith has described it. The RMA is neither,” says Cresswell. “It has destroyed property rights in this country, and it is time that the RMA itself were now destroyed.”
As author Ayn Rand once observed, when the productive have to ask permission from the unproductive in order to produce, then you may know your culture is doomed. “Time to put a stake through the heart of the RMA,” concludes Cresswell.
The Libertarianz advocate abolition of the RMA, replacing it with common law protection of property rights and the environment.

Ed Hudgins Reviews Revenge of the Sith

In an e-mail op-ed for the Objectivist Center, Ed Hudgins provides this review of the new Revenge of the Sith movie. I’ve not seen the movie, but the review makes some interesting points.
With Revenge of the Sith George Lucas faced the same problem as did the classical Greek playwrights. Their audiences already knew the stories and myths on which their dramas were based. Aeschylus, Sophocles and Euripides had to make their plays interesting, enlightening or instructive, usually by offering lessons about hubris, unchecked emotions or moral failing.
While the Greeks were not keen on happy endings, Lucas has already given one with the first Star Wars trilogy and we know what to expect in the prequels. We know that Jedi Knight Anakin Skywalker becomes Darth Vader, apprentice to the evil emperor; that Vader’s son Luke joins the rebellion; that the Empire is overthrown by pro-Republic heroes; that Vader saves Luke from the emperor, abandons the Dark Side of the Force, and before dying, is redeemed.
To make the prequels interesting Lucas offers us political and moral lessons, but with mixed results.
In Sith Lucas continues the story of the fall of the Republic. Chancellor Palpatine — secretly the evil Sith Lord Darth Sidious — accumulates power in the name of fighting a long war against separatists — a war that he himself is secretly behind. Curiously, we are told that the Senate of the Republic is corrupt and in the text crawl that starts every Star Wars film we’re told that in the war “There are heroes on both sides.” Lucas seems to be backing away from the clear-cut black-and-white, good-vs.-evil themes that so characterized the original trilogy. As he obscures that distinction he also obscures his theme.
Continue reading “Ed Hudgins Reviews Revenge of the Sith”

Pro-Democracy Movement In Cuba Assembles Today

The battle for men’s minds is still alive in Cuba.
From MSNBC: Defying Castro, activists plan open-air meeting.
Today the Assembly for the Promotion of a Civil Society in Cuba meets. It is an effort to re-unite the fractured pro-democracy movement that Castro?s regime all but demolished in 2003.

Approximately 500 people have been invited to attend the Assembly to Promote Civil Society in Cuba, representing over 300 groups on the island opposed to the Castro government including illegal political parties, human rights organizations and independent libraries.

Castro has wasted no time in trying to stifle the resurgence of this movement, using his usual intimidation tactics to keep the delegates away from the meeting. There are reports that several delegates have been arrested and detained. But they still have hope and the movement is growing. They have not given up and hopefully never will. Even under the suffocating weight of Castro’s regime, the heroes are struggling on? and gaining ground.
Elizardo Sanchez, a longtime activist in the movement:

Times have changed, though. ?Twenty years ago, there were less than 10 of us involved in open political action. Today, there are thousands standing up to this totalitarian government.?

As one Cuban-American blogger (BabaluBlog) put it:

This civil society assembly is one thing Castro cannot stand for. It’s too subversive, too contrary to his twisted values of oppression, ruin and indignity. Free men and women associating freely to decide for themselves how they will live their lives is too much for his tyranny to handle? this is the power of the human spirit.

For more information see Accion Democratica Cubana.
Viva Cuba Libre!

Letter to Ayn Rand Gets Award from NJ Governor

A fascinating announcement via the Free State Project:

Lucille Davy, Special Counsel to the Acting Governor of New Jersey, Richard J. Codey, presented a Governor’s Proclamation to Ethan Nappen, State Finalist in the national reading-writing contest sponsored by the Library of Congress, Center for the Book. The contest is called Letters About Literature. After reading Anthem by Ayn Rand, Ethan composed a letter to the author as required by the contest rules. The Library of Congress received and judged over 50,000 entries. There were over 2,300 entries submitted from students across New Jersey. Ethan, who is in eighth grade, was one of 34 Level II (7th-8th grade) finalists.
New Jersey, which was just named the third most-indebted state in the U.S., is infamous for its overregulation of business, political corruption, erosion of personal freedom, distain for individual rights, aggressive enforcement of Malum Prohibitum laws, legal embrace of political correctness, and high taxation. Rand’s Anthem deals with a future society in which collectivism and the good of the State reign supreme over the individual and even the concept of individuality. It is therefore quite ironic that the Acting Governor of New Jersey “recognizes and commends” Ethan for an essay in praise of Ayn Rand’s philosophy of objectivism.

See the Free State Project’s original announcement for links to the winning letter, the governor’s proclamation, and a photo of the award ceremony.

'The Only Path to Tomorrow' by Ayn Rand (1944)

From William Dwyer:
I just received a hard-to-find copy of the January 1944 Reader’s Digest with an article by Ayn Rand entitled “The Only Path to Tomorrow.” The article is condensed from a project that Rand began in 1943 entitled “The Moral Basis of Individualism,” which she eventually abandoned.
I am taking the liberty here of transcribing the article, which is not very long, since it is virtually impossible to find a copy of it. I was very lucky to locate the January ’44 issue from an obscure book seller. You won’t find it on the internet.

The Only Path to Tomorrow
by Ayn Rand

The greatest threat to mankind and civilization is the spread of the totalitarian philosophy. Its best ally is not the devotion of its followers but the confusion of its enemies. To fight it, we must understand it.
Totalitarianism is collectivism. Collectivism means the subjugation of the individual to a group – whether to a race, class or state does not matter. Collectivism holds that man must be chained to collective action and collective thought for the sake of what is called “the common good.”
Throughout history no tyrant ever rose to power except on the claim of representing “the common good.” Napoleon “served the common good” of France. Hitler is “serving the common good” of Germany. Horrors which no man would dare consider for his own selfish sake are perpetrated with a clear conscience by “altruists” who justify themselves by – the common good.
No tyrant has ever lasted long by force of arms alone. Men have been enslaved primarily by spiritual weapons. And the greatest of these is the collectivist doctrine that the supremacy of the state over the individual constitutes the common good. No dictator could rise if men held as a sacred faith the conviction that they have inalienable rights of which they cannot be deprived for any cause whatsoever, by any man whatsoever, neither by evildoer nor supposed benefactor.
Continue reading “'The Only Path to Tomorrow' by Ayn Rand (1944)”

The Rise of the Do-it-Yourself Economy

Here’s a development sure to appeal to fans of Atlas Shrugged-style industriousness:

It?s doubtful that Steve Jobs ever faced these kinds of interruptions. “Daddy, I want to take a picture,” says Owen Misterovich, motioning to a digital camera on his father?s desk. “Okay,” says Pat Misterovich, handing it to his 5-year-old son, who proceeds to snap a few self-portraits. Then it?s back to the work at hand: producing the next great MP3 music player. Only instead of the simple, elegant lines of the iPod, Misterovich?s device will look just like a Pez dispenser. Oh, and instead of working from a corporate campus in Cupertino, Calif., with nearly 12,000 employees, Misterovich is a stay-at-home dad, creating his Pez MP3 player from the basement of his Springfield, Mo., home.
Misterovich is the former head of IT at the University of Detroit Mercy. He has few of the engineering skills necessary to build a device like this, no marketing experience, and absolutely no corporate infrastructure. And yet he?s got two factories?one in China, one in the U.S.?vying to build the player. He has a small Austin company started by an ex-Apple engineer designing the innards. And on his blog, pezmp3.com, he uses prospective buyers?some 1,500 people have already expressed interest?as an R&D-center-meets-focus-group. What?s better, he asks, AAA batteries or Li-Ion? In come dozens of replies (“Go for the AAA with a USB NiMh recharger if possible,” suggests one reader). What?s a good slogan? Some 50 ideas roll in (one of the best: “Candy for your ears”). By the end of this month the first prototype should be in Misterovich?s hands. “I don?t know that this product could have come to life years ago,” he says. “I seriously doubt it. And if it did, it wouldn?t have come through a guy in his basement.”
It used to be that a tinkerer like Misterovich could, at best, hope to sell his idea to a big company. More likely, he?d entertain friends with his Pez-sized visions. But a number of factors are coming together to empower amateurs in a way never before possible, blurring the lines between those who make and those who take. Unlike the dot-com fortune hunters of the late 1990s, these do-it-yourselfers aren?t deluding themselves with oversized visions of what they might achieve. Instead, they?re simply finding a way?in this mass-produced, Wal-Mart world?to take power back, prove that they can make the products that they want to consume, have fun doing so, and, just maybe, make a few dollars.

See the full article, “The Amazing Rise of the Do-It-Yourself Economy” at Fortune. Thanks to InstaPundit for the link.

Atlas Spooned

A new phenomenon from New York has been attracting quite a bit of media attention lately. It?s called a Cuddle Party, and is described as a ?workshop/social event for adults to explore giving and receiving affectionate touch in a safe, non-sexual setting.?
As it turns out, the Cuddle Party?s creators, Reid Mihalko and Marcia Baczynski, consider themselves huge fans of Ayn Rand?s novels. So much so that they named their company “Atlas Spooned.” Asked what Atlas Shrugged means to them, the duo answers, ?It?s about integrity.?
When Atlasphere member and columnist Andrew Schwartz was introduced to Baczynski in September (through mutual friend Pete Lyons, yet another Atlasphere member) Schwartz found the concept so worthwhile that he decided to start hosting Cuddle Parties in Los Angeles.
?When I first heard about Cuddle Party on the internet, before meeting Marcia, I was pretty dismissive,? says Schwartz. ?I figured this was a way for immature adults to behave like immature college students.?
?But when I learned more about the structure of Cuddle Party, and subsequently attended an event myself, I became enthusiastically impressed with the way it teaches extremely mature communication and boundary-setting skills.?
And on the Rand connection? ?If you want to get Randian about it, Cuddle Party as a workshop is all about personal responsibility, self-assertion, and respect for others in the context of affectionate touch. It teaches unusually straightforward communication around asking for what one wants and saying ?no? clearly and plainly to what one doesn?t want.?
?Also,? Schwartz adds, ?it’s just plain fun.?
You can learn more about these events on the Los Angeles Cuddle Party site.