Category: Politics

Radley Balko has an excellent article on FoxNews exposing the modern Republican party’s abysmal record of enforcing limited government. Not that this is a news flash, for most people. But it’s alarming nonetheless, and Balko does a nice job of summarizing the key failures.
His article begins:

The Washington Post reports that in 1987, President Ronald Reagan vetoed a transportation bill passed by Congress because it had 157 “earmarks”â?? money set aside for Congress members’ pet projects that would ostensibly be considered too wasteful to pass as laws on their own merit.
Reagan made a show of his veto. It was a symbolic stroke against government waste, against the Democratsâ?? tradition of, for example, diverting every federal highway through West Virginia, then naming it after Sen. Robert Byrd.
Fast-forward to 2005. Republicans control the White House and both houses of Congress. Early on a Saturday morning in August â?? the day of the week, and the month of the year, least likely to attract media attention â?? President Bush signed into law a highway bill passed by his own party with more than 6,000 earmarked projects.
Bush signed the bill after sternly telling his party he’d veto any highway bill that spent more than $256 billion. He promptly “adjusted” that figure to $284 billion after complaints from party leaders. The bill Bush ultimately signed came at a price of $286 billion, $295 billion if you count a few provisions disguised to make the bill look cheaper than it actually is. Not exactly holding the line.
The Republican Party’s wholesale abandonment of limited government principles has been on display since President Bush took office. Government spending under the GOP’s reign has soared to historic highs, any way you want to measure it. And in stark contrast to President Reagan â?? or even the president’s own fatherâ??President Bush refuses to rein in spending. He hasnâ??t used his veto a single time since taking office â?? the longest such streak in U.S. history.

See the full article for more details.

Paul Eidelberg, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, detects the ideas behind the Israeli unilateral withdrawal from the Gaza Strip. He writes:

It began when the leaders of Israel, superficially good men, began to consort with profoundly bad men. I am referring to Israeli prime ministers, the leaders of a reputed democracyâ??ostensibly a good regimeâ??began to negotiate publicly with Arab tyrants, i.e., the rulers of bad regimesâ??and did so in quest of â??peace.â?
By negotiating with bad men, Israeli prime ministers dignified them and thereby obscured the difference between just and unjust regimes. In other words, Israeli prime ministers initiated what is now called â??moral equivalence.â? By so doing, they morally disarmed their own people. They lowered their peopleâ??s moral standards as well as their peopleâ??s sense of honor.

In an op-ed at the onset of the withdrawal process two years ago, Robert Tracinski observed:

Justice demands that one judge rationally the character and conduct of those one deals with, rewarding the good and punishing the evil. To insist on diplomacy as an unqualified virtue–regardless of the nature and conduct of one’s foe–does not save lives or resolve conflicts; it merely rewards and emboldens the aggressors.

As Ayn Rand wrote in Atlas Shrugged, “In any compromise between food and poison, it is only death that can win. In any compromise between good and evil, it is only evil that can profit.”

As we’ve mentioned before, the FairTax Act is probably the most viable opportunity we’ll see in our lifetime to eliminate the dreaded and immoral IRS.
Today we learned that the book which describes and promotes the Act in layman’s terms, The FairTax Book, will debut at the top of the New York Times non-fiction bestseller list.
As Neal Boortz explains on his blog:

This means so much for The FairTax movement. Any book that rises to No. 1 creates a buzz … whether it’s about teenaged wizards or tax reform. Well … especially tax reform. This just doesn’t happen. Books on tax reform don’t go to No. 1. So now opinion makers, politicians, pundits, editorial writers, reporters, columnists and others will take notice and start paying attention. This will result in more and more efforts such as this opinion piece that appeared in the Clark Times-Courier in Berryville, Virginia.
Late yesterday I was notified that a writer and photographer from a major national magazine will join the book tour today to see just what is going on here. This will mean that more and more Americans will become aware of the essence of the FairTax, and what it can mean to both their personal financial picture and to the American economy. As the people become aware this idea becomes more and more impossible for the political class to ignore.

If you haven’t already done so, this is a good time to check out the book, buy yourself a copy, and consider signing the FairTax petition as well.
UPDATE: For updated news about the FairTax plan, visit the Fair Tax Blog.

The FairTax plan — almost certainly the most viable plan in our lifetime to eliminate the dreaded and immoral U.S. Internal Revenue Service — just received some invaluable press coverage on FoxNews.
In particular, The FairTax Book authors Neal Boortz and John Linder were interviewed by conservative commentator Sean Hannity (who is throwing his own weight behind the plan) on “Hannity & Colmes.”
Even better, the full, uncut video is available online. Spread the word!

From an article (“Finger points to British intelligence as al-Qaeda websites are wiped out“) in the Times Online:

Over the past fortnight Israeli intelligence agents have noticed something distinctly odd happening on the internet. One by one, Al-Qaeda?s affiliated websites have vanished until only a handful remain, write Uzi Mahnaimi and Alex Pell.
Someone has cut the line of communication between the spiritual leaders of international terrorism and their supporters. Since 9/11 the websites have been the main links to disseminate propaganda and information.
The Israelis detect the hand of British intelligence, determined to torpedo the websites after the London attacks of July 7.
The web has become the new battleground of terrorism, permitting a freedom of communication denied to such organisations as the IRA a couple of decades ago.
One global jihad site terminated recently was an inflammatory Pakistani site, www.mojihedun.com, in which a section entitled How to Strike a European City gave full technical instructions. Tens of similar sites, some offering detailed information on how to build and use biological weapons, have also been shut down. However, Islamic sites believed to be ?moderate?, remain.

See the full article for more background. Via Drudge.

According to a new article in the Dakota Voice, Logan Darrow Clements has received an enthusiastically supportive response from New Hampshire residents and is proceeding with his plans for the Lost Liberty Hotel:
Logan Darrow Clements, CEO of Freestar Media, LLC, is moving forward with plans to have the town of Weare, New Hampshire, take the home of Supreme Court Judge David H. Souter for development of a new “Lost Liberty Hotel.”
As reported by Dakota Voice and others, Clements expressed interest in Souter’s home after a Supreme Court ruling supported by Souter himself was made in “Kelo vs. City of New London,” allowing city governments to take land from one private owner and give it to another if the government will generate greater tax revenue or other economic benefits when the land is developed by the new owner.
Just 24 hours after Clements’ announcement, the town of Weare was “inundated” by calls and emails of support for Clements’ proposal.
Mr. Clements wants to build “The Lost Liberty Hotel,” which will feature the “Just Desserts Café.” The hotel would include a museum, open to the general public, featuring a permanent exhibit on the loss of freedom in America. Instead of a Gideon’s Bible each guest will receive a free copy of Ayn Rand’s novel “Atlas Shrugged.”
In the Lost Liberty Hotel newsletter issued today, Clements said some of the comments he has received “inspired me and others made me laugh so hard I nearly fell out of my chair.”
Clements says he has received about 6,000 emails and voicemails, and his website started to receive about 370,000 visits a day. He is is looking to hire staff to help him.
The newsletter also states that Clements is looking for an experienced hotel developer. He is already talking to several companies, but would like to hear from more so that he can make the best decision possible.
Clements also says that even if the Board of Selectmen in Weare doesn’t vote in favor of his proposal, which would generate more tax revenue for them than Souter’s property tax nets, that several citizens are drafting ballot initiatives which would bypass the Board and accomplish the same results.
Clements points out that he has not yet officially made this proposal, but wants to secure a development company first, to prepare all the architectural drawings, economic viability statistics, financial statements, etc. to illustrate how the venture will work and succeed. Clements says that at this point, he has only faxed the town, asking them to outline the procedures for making such a proposal.
Clements is scheduled to appear on a national cable television show the afternoon of Tuesday, July 12 (more details to follow).