With the incredible popularity of Facebook, we’ve now added a space for Atlasphere members to share direct links to their Facebook profiles.
You can add a link to your Facebook profile on the page for editing the general info portion of your Atlasphere directory profile.
We welcome your feedback on this new feature.
Category: The Atlasphere
All things Atlasphere can be found here, columns, podcasts, interesting anecdotes, and more.
New feature: Browse sites and blogs for free
We’ve made some experimental changes to the Atlasphere’s member directory pages:
- Unpaid members can now see full names
- Unpaid members can now browse all member blogs
- Unpaid members can now browse all member websites
Previously, these features were available only to paid subscribers.
There are thousands of member blogs and websites listed in the Atlasphere directory, so this opens up a significant new channel for interaction, even among members with no paid subscription.
We hope you find these new features useful and welcome your feedback about this or any other aspect of the Atlasphere.
The Stuxnet story: Better than fiction
If you haven’t already seen it, don’t miss the story “Mystery Surrounds Cyber Missile That Crippled Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Ambitions.”
I found myself marveling several times at the brilliance and ingenuity of Stuxnet. The way it unfolded on the world stage seems like the sort of “series of mysterious events” that could have been in Atlas Shrugged, were it written today rather than in the 1950s.
AIG chief invokes Ayn Rand while defending his bailout
J.P. Freire makes some astute observations, over at the Washington Examiner blog. Worth a look, if only to see what AIG executive Robert Benmosche has been reading. And not fully understanding.
Great story: Jaroslav Romanchuk teaching free market principles to Burmese dissidents
Kelley Currie at The Weekly Standard blog has this beautiful anecdote about our beloved Jaroslav:
I met Romanchuk about a decade ago in Thailand, of all places. He was sent to me by colleagues at the International Republican Institute, where I was working at the time, to help with a problem I was having with my Burmese dissidents. They were good guysâ??committed to democracy and willing to risk their lives for it. They were also big admirers of Communist economic theories, and did not seem to understand the infrangible link between the economics of Marxism and its political tyranny. My attempts to get them to read the Economist and Adam Smith were going nowhere, so I got the idea that it might help them to hear from someone who had actually lived under a Communist system and had run away from it screaming.
Enter Romanchuk. He was as close to a pure Ayn Rand-spouting Objectivist as I have ever met, not to mention an incredibly brilliant economist who gave my well-intentioned Burmese dissidents brain cramps when he clearly explained how oppressive an economy based on redistribution and “social justice” actually was in real life. You could have heard a pin drop when he told them about the unsuccessful attempts on his life as a result of his work with an opposition political party under Lukashenko’s dictatorship. He also exhibited an unbelievably foul sense of humor and could, naturally, drink us all under the table, which he proceeded to do every night. Because he had street credibility, the Burmese dissidents could relate to him immediately. They never stopped asking for me to bring him back for a second round, but unfortunately I was unable to do so.
See her full blog post for more context for this anecdote.
"It is we who move the world"
Cross-posted from the Atlas Shrugged movie blog:
A couple of reviewers — Richard Gleaves and Fred Cookinham — who saw the ten minute sneak peak of the Atlas Shrugged movie in New York City noted that the phrase “It is we who move the world” from Ayn Rand’s novel had been changed to “It is us who move the world.”
The change was not well received. Cookinham, for example, wrote:
Language has also fallen apart since 1957. In the clips, Rearden says to Dagny, â??It is us who move the world, and itâ??s us who will pull it through.â? The â??usâ? should be â??we.â? It is â??weâ? in the novel, and all the screenwriter had to do was copy it. But apparently he found it necessary to dumb down the language from 1957â??s English to 2010â??s pidgin.
Ouch!
Good news, though — the producers say it’s going to be fixed. See this exchange with screenwriter Brian O’Toole from the movie’s Facebook fan page:
Teresa Summerlee Isanhart: I really disagree that replacing “we” with “us” is a “dumbed down” effort. Honestly, I just don’t think Rand would have a problem with a change like that. …
Atlas Shrugged The Movie: â??@Teresa – Interesting enough, the US instead of WE was a choice made by the actor and so was not delivered as written but I guess it’s easiest to blame the writer. 🙂 I believe the line is scheduled to be fixed during the ADR session with the actor. Thanks for the continued support! Best, Brian O’Toole
This is wonderful news to those of us who enjoy the classicism and elegance of Rand’s original phrasing.
Let a thousand Atlas Shrugged movies bloom?
If you’re not already familiar with it, check out ARI’s “Atlas Shrugged Video Contest.” I think this kind of contest is brilliant, and I salute their innovative efforts here.
It also reminds me of a comment a friend of mine made recently on Facebook, concerning the new Atlas Shrugged movie:
[I’ve long thought Aglialoro should] encourage the production of multiple versions, with a variety of artistic interpretations, styles, production qualities, of Atlas Shrugged as a movie.
I actually think the control that Aglialoro, or any other producer, wants to exert over the film is the biggest obstacle. They want it to be great. Naturally, we sympathize with them, and applaud them for this. This has been the obstacle keeping the movie from being made for so long.
It’s ultimately pointless: How much can Aglialoro affect the quality of the film? He’s pretty much limited to choosing the director and other essential staff. This is large, but… he also needs to ask how great he is at choosing, influencing, controlling artistic interpretation. Or for that matter, his directors or any other key creative contributors.
If instead of clutching the rights to make the movie, he made them free and invited all comers… we could see multiple versions made. I think this would stimulate much greater discussion of the interpretation of the book and the creative merits of each movie, and it would be a discussion which would last for years not just the few weeks or months that the feature film hits the box office. … Keep reading »
Read the rest of this post on our blog for the Atlas Shrugged movie.
Comments are now enabled
We’ve enabled comments here on the Ayn Rand Meta-Blog, on an experimental basis. For now, they are enabled for new posts, including those from the past week or two. If it proves worthwhile we may enable comments on older posts as well.
Let us know what you think … in the comments below. 🙂
Megan McArdle's critique of WikiLeaks
Since publishing our article yesterday in defense of WikiLeaks, I’ve been on the lookout for good articles presenting the case against WikiLeaks. Megan McArdle provides a pretty good one.
UPDATE – (Dec 12) For two more interesting perspectives on WikiLeaks, see Ron Paul’s defense of WikiLeaks and Clay Shirky’s insightful review of the long-term implications of WikiLeaks. The latter may be the most even-handed commentary I’ve seen.
Got additional insights on the subject? Share them in the comments below.
An update on the (defunct) Founder's College
Some of you may recall a project we mentioned here in 2006 called “Founder’s College,” which was backed by Objectivists. The Chronicle of Higher Education has a recent article about what eventually became of the college. It is not inspiring.