Ayn Rand Centenary Events

The Ayn Rand Institute and Objectivist Conferences are commemorating Ayn Rand’s centenary in two weekend events in Irvine, California (February 2-6, 2005) and in New York City (April 23-24, 2005).
Below is a summary of the events. For more details, pricing and registration information, visit the Objectivist Conferences Web site.

Centenary Event Schedule in 2005

Irvine, California
February 2: Ayn Rand Institute 20th Anniversary Reception
February 4: FREE Lecture by Peter Schwartz: The Virtue of Selfishness: Why Achieving Your Happiness Is Your Highest Moral Purpose
February 5: Four Lectures: A Celebration of Ayn Rand’s Life
February 5: Celebration Dinner With Leonard Peikoff and Mary Ann Sures
February 6: Breakfast With Yaron Brook: ARI and the Future of Objectivism
New York City
April 23: Four Lectures: A Celebration of Ayn Rand’s Life
April 23: Celebration Dinner With Mary Ann Sures
April 24: Presentation: Guide to Ayn Rand Sites in Manhattan, With Q & A
April 24: FREE Lecture by Yaron Brook: ARI and the Future of Objectivism

Free Radical Interview with Nathaniel Branden

The Oct/Nov issue of Free Radical includes an interview with Nathaniel Branden that is sure to stimulate controversy.
The interview was conducted by Alec Mouhibian, and covers Branden’s thoughts about Ronald Reagan, gay marriage, the war in Iraq, the importance of writing books, why an imperfect ideological system (such as Christianity) can still be psychologically beneficial, the proper and improper use of moral judgment, the philosophical importance of procreation, and why the nature of sexual attraction is much more complicated than one would gather from reading Francisco’s speech in Atlas Shrugged.
The full interview is available on Nathaniel Branden’s web site.

Sizing Up Jennifer Garner's 'Elektra'

In an interview for her new movie, Jennifer Garner says:

Women come up to me and say, “I am who I am because I read Elektra when I was a kid.” I realize how much this role means to people.

Sound familiar? It’s reminiscent of the things women say about Atlas Shrugged. Whether Elektra truly bears comparison to Atlas is beyond me, but clearly there is some parallel between Elektra and Dagny Taggart in terms of their impact on strong young women.
The movie is receiving a great deal of advance publicity, and Apple has posted not only the threatrical trailer but also a “martial arts featurette” (in which this quote from Garner appears) and three clips “inside the editing room” with director Rob Bowman.
Check it out if you’re interested.

Atlasphere Nuptials (with Photo)

Here is a photo of the newlyweds from this month’s “In the Atlasphere” announcement. We offer our hearty congratulations to Grant and Honor on their joyous union.
From their letter to the Atlasphere:

What does one say to the people who have introduced you to your best friend, soul mate, and ideal business partner? This is the question that my darling husband and I are struggling to answer. If it weren’t for this magnificent web site, I don’t know how we could ever have met. We lived on opposite coasts and were skeptical about Internet dating services, that is, until we discovered The Atlasphere.
We had both learned the hard way that we would never be fulfilled romantically with a partner that did not share our sincere commitment to studying and practicing Objectivist values. We had chosen to live alone rather than to compromise any longer in this critical area of our lives. In addition, we both understood that we needed a partner with similar interests or who at least would be open to activities that we enjoyed. All of this and more we found in each other.
It was in the summer of this year that I first discovered The Atlasphere and my future husband, Grant Reason. I read his profile the very first time I visited the web site, and though he had not posted a photo, by the time I finished reading his profile, I sincerely believed I had found my match. His values so clearly reflected my own, it was a dream come true, and it was clear that he was passionate about Objectivism.
I realized that in order for me to contact him, I would have to post a description of myself, which I found to be a great challenge. I really liked the fact that I could edit my own profile online and did not have to upload a photo. I was delighted that I could just “send a smile” and let him decide if he was interested. Little did I know that he had seen my profile before he received my smile, and that he was already smiling and composing an email to me!
What began with a smile by email ended up in a face-to-face smile (on my side of the country) at the Baltimore Washington airport on August 7, just a few weeks after we had burned up the phone lines for many hours. By the next day, I was so in love with him that I actually proposed, “Grant Reason, will you marry me?” He replied, “In a heartbeat,” and I responded: “In a mindbeat.”
We had truly connected in our hearts and minds and were married in a local courthouse on the 13th of August, which, by the way, was also “Friday the 13th” (a date we thought appropriate, to demonstrate we had no trace of superstition).
We had a magnificent drive across the country and arrived in California on September 15. We are now living near San Diego and have started a business together and are helping others to do the same.
When our friends and family ask us why we decided to get married in such an incredibly short time, I tell them, you wouldn’t understand, couldn’t begin to understand, unless you’ve had the experience of actually meeting your soul mate.
By the way, I’ve legally changed my name to one I intend to live by: Honor Reason. If I could share one thing with the readers of this web site it is this: Honor yourself and love yourself so that you will be able to honor and love another.

New Intellectual Forum's Solstice Celebration

Located in Chicago, The New Intellectual Forum is one of the longest-running Objectivist salons in the country. Since 1988, it has been meeting monthly in members homes, with parties twice a year, including a Solstice Celebration this Saturday, December 4.
Get togethers consist of a presentation, usually by one of the members, on topics ranging as far as the members’ imaginations go: from the nature of number to extreme sports, from examining heroes to international law. The discussion assumes a basic agreement with Ayn Rand’s ideas, and reason, civility and good fellowship rule the roost.
Festivities usually begin at a local restaurant where members meet for dinner at 6 PM, usually on the third Saturday of the month. At 8 PM, all retire to a member’s home (most often of late, John and Marsha Enright’s on the South Side), where snacks are shared and drinks are provided. Between 8 and 8:30, participants assemble for the presentation, which may be anywhere from fifteen minutes to one hour, followed by lively discussion.
A break for food and drink usualy follows, and members enjoy continuing conversation, often into the wee hours.
New members and out-of-towners are welcome! Contact Marsha Enright for more information.
Continue reading “New Intellectual Forum's Solstice Celebration”

Andy Reicker: Graphics Entrepreneur Inspired by Atlas Shrugged

Some of the giant banners you saw on the Thanksgiving holiday NFL games were designed by a serious Atlas Shrugged fan named Andy Reicker, owner of the multi-million-dollar firm Project Graphics.
From a profile of Reicker and Project Graphics in Connecticut’s New Times Live:

“I’m pretty surprised at where I am today,” said the New Fairfield bachelor, a self-described optimist and workaholic whose friendly demeanor in no way diminishes his fanatic pursuit of excellence. “I walk in the door sometimes, and I’m, like, shocked.
“It’s cool.”
Eleven years ago, the up-and-coming entrepreneur embarked on a quest to start his own, large-scale, customized graphic design and printing business, skills he fine-tuned after earning degrees in English and literature at the University of Minnesota.
After spending a few years in Colorado working for an established graphics company, he decided it was time to branch out on his own. He leaned on experiences he learned from working in his family’s catering business on how to sell and market his product.
Inspiration came from reading the controversial 20th century American classic, “Atlas Shrugged” by Ayn Rand. He said the novel encouraged him to live boldly and make things happen, and ignited in him a yearning to build his own business.
To this day, he embraces certain passages from the novel, reciting lines from it and other works of literature to his employees. The message: Always stretch beyond your comfort zones; always seek the next challenge.

See the full article for additional information.

Michael Milken, Privatizing Medical Research

Michael Milken, whose prosecution for violation of insider trading laws in the early 90s was condemned by many Objectivist commentators, is featured in a terrific cover article in this month’s Fortune magazine.
The article (available to subscribers of that magazine) begins:

The image on the oversized screen behind the podium was of a giant malignant tumor. The discussion was about prognostic indicators?doctorspeak for how much longer people with such tumors had to live. The prognosis wasn’t good, with life expectancy measured in months, not years. The presenter’s manner was cold, but it didn’t matter: This was no hospital bedside but a roomful of physicians, gathered for a seminar on prostate cancer at Houston’s prestigious M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. In the third row sat a tall, slight, unimposing man. The top of his middle-aged head no longer had hair; his eyebrows were thin. His nametag read dr. robert hackel, and all he could think about was how enormous the tumor looked onscreen. A tumor just like his own.
When the speaker, Donald Coffey, an esteemed prostate cancer expert from Johns Hopkins, was finished, Hackel made his way to the front. For 25 minutes he grilled Coffey on his presentation, asking technical questions about the research and its therapeutic implications. At what should have been the end of a friendly exchange between colleagues, Hackel turned to Coffey and said, “I am Mike Milken. I want to be cured.”
Coffey knew the name. It was 1993, and Michael Milken, the once-highflying junk-bond wizard had, a few years earlier, been a familiar face in the newspapers because of his high-profile indictment on securities violations. Only two weeks before, in fact, Milken?now wearing a phony ID badge with his middle name and father-in-law’s surname?had been released from prison, having served 22 months. Coffey was surprised not just by who his questioner was, but by the fact that he wasn’t a doctor. His toupee gone and his toothy grin somewhat modulated, Milken seemed more like a veteran lab scientist than a desperate patient. He knew much about the biology of cancer.
It was only when Milken began to speak rapturously about turning prostate cancer research on its head and starting “a Manhattan Project for cancer” that the financier sounded a bit naive. A real physician would have known better, thought Coffey. “The truth was, at the time, there was so little research?or anything else?going on in the field [of prostate cancer], it was as if Milken was speaking in tongues,” he says. Still, the good doctor listened politely.
Eleven years later many others are listening too. That’s because Milken has, in fact, turned the cancer establishment upside down.

How did he do this? In a word: privatization. Together with other high-profile entrepreneurs such as Intel’s Andy Grove, Milken started a private foundation to aggressively fund innovative research to cure prostate cancer. (Not to “understand” or “promote awareness” of prostate cancer ? to cure it.)
At first, establishment researchers were wary of the funding requirements, which include sharing the results of their research with other researchers before it goes through the lengthy process of getting published in peer-reviewed journals. But prostate cancer research had been mired in bureaucratic red tape for many years, and the prospect of receiving $100,000 in funding within 90 days ? rather than the 2-3 years required for government-funded research ? eventually won the researchers over to the merits of private funding.
Today Milken’s institution has funded so many new treatments and drug therapies that, had it sought to retain ownership of such treatments, it would be the world’s third-largest biotechnology company. (I’m paraphrasing from memory, here; I read the full story this morning but don’t have it handy.)
The result? Deaths from prostate cancer are declining steeply, and Milken himself is in seemingly full remission.
See the full story in Fortune for additional information.

On Calling a Spade a Shovel

An interesting posting to the OWL discussion group by Erik Herbertson, of Sweden:
I have a suggestion for especially those of you who are Americans. When you write about “liberals” of the American variety, i.e. welfare statists, it would be good if you used quotation marks to underscore that it’s a false liberalism. Ayn Rand used to do that. It’s also a point to state, if there’s room for it, the reasons.
In most countries in the world, except apparently in the U.S., the terms “liberal” and “liberalism” can be used in the sense we approve of, namely a position in favour of free markets, individual freedom and limited government.
Sure, “liberalism” can even in Europe (and my country Sweden) be used in the welfare statist meaning, but there’s no problem for me to attach my pro-capitalist, pro-individualist views to the word “liberalism”. The welfare statist variety of liberalism is often called “socialliberalism” in Scandinavia, or “sozialliberalismus” in German-speaking countries.
Free market liberalism sometimes is called neo-liberalism, classical liberalism, old liberalism (confusing for beginners :-)), laissez-faire-liberalism or Manchester liberalism, but also just liberalism or “pure liberalism”.
The Liberal parties throughout the world are not always the same as true liberalism. But in most countries, those parties who call themselves liberal are the most free-market-oriented.
The Liberal Party of Canada and the Liberal Democrats of UK belongs to the left wing of the Liberal International. But in especially the European continent and Eastern Europe, Liberal parties are the parties of low taxes, free markets and personal freedom, even though they are not libertarian (Partito Liberale in Italy is libertarian).
The Estonian Reform Party and Polish Freedom Union have libertarian leanings, and the Costa Rican Movimiento Libertario (libertarian) is a member of the Liberal International.
One can question if it’s wise for free-market-oriented liberals to cooperate with “social liberals” in an International, but I wanted to make a point about the orientation many Liberal parties have, an orientation you wouldn’t even expect from a U.S. Republican.
Even in Canada, there’s the provincial party “B.C. Liberals” (British Columbia), which is separate from the Liberal Party of Canada, and have a policy in favour of free enterprise and lower taxes. Consistent advocates of laissez-faire could question some of its implementations, but it seems that there’s a change in Canada over the meaning of “liberalism”.
In other English-speaking countries like Australia, New Zealand and South Africa, “liberalism” is often meant to be pro-capitalism and pro-individualism.
In France, “liberal” is almost always used in the correct way, and therefore the French left use it as a derogatory term :-). Good that the French at least are right about this terminology.
Erik Herbertson, true liberal

Thanksgiving: The Producer's Holiday

Writing for the Ayn Rand Institute, Gary Hull has published an ode to Thanksgiving as “the Producer’s Holiday”:

Thanksgiving celebrates man’s ability to produce. The cornucopia filled with exotic flowers and delicious fruits, the savory turkey with aromatic trimmings, the mouth-watering pies, the colorful decorations–it’s all a testament to the creation of wealth.
Thanksgiving is a uniquely American holiday, because this country was the first to create and to value material abundance. It is America that has been the beacon for anyone wanting to escape from poverty and misery. It is America that generated the unprecedented flood of goods that washed away centuries of privation. It is America, by establishing the precondition of production–political freedom–that was able to unleash the dynamic, productive energy of its citizens.
This should be a source of pride to every self-supporting individual. It is what Thanksgiving is designed to commemorate. But there are those, motivated by hatred for human comfort and happiness, who want to make Thanksgiving into a day of national guilt. We should be ashamed, they say, for consuming a disproportionate share of the world’s food supply. Our affluence, they say, constitutes a depletion of the “planet’s resources.” The building of dams, the use of fossil fuels, the driving of sports utility vehicles–they insist–are cause, not for celebration, but for atonement. What if, they all wail, the rest of the world consumed the way Americans do?

See the full op-ed for additional analysis.

More on Ayn Rand and The Incredibles

The new movie The Incredibles received a terrific write-up in yesterday’s Washington Times. The review begins:

For decades, kids have enjoyed following the out-of-this-world exploits of comic-book heroes, learning along the way about courage and the need for good to triumph over the plots of those possessed by evil. Every generation must learn its own duty to sacrifice and fight for the good.
But lately, ever since the first “Spiderman” live-action movie roared at the box office, fans of the long-lasting Marvel Comics stable of superheroes have been inundated with big, noisy, expensive blockbusters bringing these two-dimensional pen-and-ink heroes to life. Unfortunately, in attempting to dramatize Marvel honcho Stan Lee’s formula ? paper heroes deepened on the page by troubled private lives in their worlds of secret identity ? these films have all suffered in varying degrees, growing ever more dark and gloomy, almost hopeless.
While the “Spiderman” films have retained a fraction of whimsy, movies like “Daredevil” and “The Incredible Hulk” have left many fans wishing they had seen more righteous heroism and less sulky realism. In the final analysis, superhero comics work best when the reader is inspired, not left seeking Dr. Phil. Complex superheroes can make for a nice, dramatic storyline, but when they’re so tortured by personal demons, they can’t be very super, can they?
For those who like their heroes a little less super-serious than the superhuman characters of old, there is a surprisingly mature option: Pixar’s new cartoon “The Incredibles.” This film unfolds like a comic book, with lots of action. But between its animated lines, it offers real lessons about heroism, the use of talents and commitment to family. It’s not often a cartoon carries a line where a child worries, “Mom and Dad’s life could be in jeopardy … or even worse … their marriage.”

See the full review for additional information about this apparently-terrific, and refreshing, film.