John Stossel Credits Ayn Rand

The Atlas Society reports that the Daily Princetonian ? the Princeton University student newspaper ? carries an interview with John Stossel, the famous investigative reporter for ABC News. From the inteview:

When I struggling with these ideas, I was reading the liberal press, which was in love with the welfare state, and it didn’t really make sense to me. And the conservative press seemed to want to bring police into our bedrooms.
Then I discovered something called Reason Magazine, based out of Los Angeles, which just made sense. Suddenly there were these people who grappled with these ideas before me who understood them better than I did and had a real intellectual foundation for it. My favorite writer there was the editor ? a woman named Virginia Postrel ? who I assumed was some 60 year old lady writing brilliant stuff. But she turned out to be about 10 years behind me at Princeton … Ayn Rand and a book by Charles Murray called In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government have also influenced me.

Stossel?s hard-hitting TV specials and reports on the show ?20/20? are grounded explicitly in a libertarian philosophy. And among those whom he acknowledges in his new bestseller, Give Me a Break, is The Objectivist Center Executive Director David Kelley.

Friend of America on Norwegian Television

Last year, Atlasphere member Fredrik Norman helped found an organization called Norwegian Friends of America. This past Saturday, he was interviewed on a Norwegian talk show about his views on the subject.
From his interview:

Knut Olsen: Is Bush worth dying for?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: Hopefully we won’t have to die because of Bush. Hopefully, we also won’t have to die because of Osama bin Laden, terrorists and tyrants — and that’s what the Americans are trying to save us from.
Knut Olsen: But is he worth fighting for?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: We should fight for ourselves and our own interests, and they are the same as American interests: liberty, democracy and human rights. This, we shall fight for, hopefully together with our allies.
Knut Olsen: Do you personally support Bush’s foreign policy?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: Which parts of Bush’s foreign policy I do or don’t support, I find rather irrelevant…
Knut Olsen: But is it the official stance of the Norwegian Friends of America that you do so?
Fredrik K.R. Norman: We support America’s moral right to defend her interests, because we believe those interests are the same as Norway’s interests. American interests are liberty, democracy and human rights, and those are also Norwegian interests.

Fredrik stayed remarkably cool, articulate, and principled throughout his on-air grilling. Read a transcription of the full interview at FredrikNorman.com. Via Instapundit.

Hudgins on George Washington's Legacy

Ed Hudgins, TOC Washington Director, writes in his latest Report from the Front on the first U.S. President’s political and moral legacy:

Washington?s achievements reflected his outstanding moral character. He set for himself the highest standards in everything he did and thus became exemplar for his associates and his fellow countrymen. Indeed, when he presided over the Constitutional Convention, he spoke little. It was his example — the fact that the other delegates were in the presence of Washington — that kept those delegates on their best behavior and inspired them to look to the good of the country.
But Washington was not some ever-frowning moralist; he enjoyed life, whether at a dance or dinner party or just riding through his beloved Mt. Vernon estate.

Read the full article…

Ridpath on George Washington's Virtues

ARI op-ed columnist John Ridpath has written a moving tribute to the first of American presidents, titled “America Needs a Leader Like George Washington.”

On Presidents’ Day, Americans have an opportunity to reflect on its Presidents?past and present?and particularly on those who have been great leaders. History is replete with examples of charismatic power-lusting “leaders” directing mindless and obedient legions on campaigns of suppression and destruction. But America’s great leaders have been different.
America has often been blessed, in times of crisis, with principled, moral leaders, directing this nation against history’s tyrants and in pursuit of freedom and the rights of man.
Now, once again facing a crisis, America searches for great leadership. Awash in a morass of moral compromise, poll-taking, and hesitation to offend world opinion, Americans desperately seize on any hint of strength, of moral certainty, of a refusal to swim with others in the swamp of compromise, empty rhetoric and threats that now passes for “leadership” in Washington, D.C.
Where can Americans turn, to witness the spectacle of great leadership?
On Presidents’ Day, this country should look, for inspiration and conviction, to America’s greatest leader, George Washington.
Washington, in company with the other Founding Fathers of America, was a son of the 18th century Enlightenment. His vision of America was one of responsible, independent, free, and hard-working citizens, prospering in a system of political and economic freedom. He believed that America would become a beacon of liberty and justice to men everywhere.

Read the full article….

Environmentalists Prove Ayn Rand Right

In an article for Australia’s The Age, Sixties environmental activist Patrick Moore discusses the changes that have come over the environmental movement in the past forty years. He begins:

I was raised in the tiny fishing and logging village of Winter Harbour on the north-west tip of Vancouver Island, where salmon spawned in the streams of the adjoining Pacific rainforest.
In school, I discovered ecology, and realised that through science I could gain insight into the natural beauties I had known as a child. In the late 1960s I was transformed into a radical environmental activist.
A ragtag group of activists and I sailed a leaky old halibut boat across the North Pacific to block the last US hydrogen bomb tests under President Richard Nixon. In the process I co-founded Greenpeace.

Ayn Rand and Peter Schwartz make a cameo:

At the beginning of the modern environmental movement, Ayn Rand published Return of the Primitive, which contained an essay by Peter Schwartz “The Anti-Industrial Revolution.” In it, he warned that the new movement’s agenda was anti-science, anti-technology, and anti-human.
At the time, he didn’t get a lot of attention from the mainstream media or the public.
Environmentalists were often able to produce arguments that sounded reasonable, while doing good deeds like saving whales and making the air and water cleaner.
But now the chickens have come home to roost. The environmentalists’ campaign against biotechnology in general, and genetic engineering in particular, has exposed their intellectual and moral bankruptcy.
By adopting a zero-tolerance policy towards a technology with so many potential benefits for humankind and the environment, they have lived up to Schwartz’s predictions.
They have alienated themselves from scientists, intellectuals and internationalists.
It seems inevitable that the media and the public will, in time, see the insanity of their position.

Read the whole article for more interesting stories from a former environmental activist.
UPDATE: Michelle Fram-Cohen points out an historical inaccuracy in Moore’s account of Rand’s book:

The facts are that in 1971 Rand published a collection of her essays under the title The New Left: The Anti Industrial Revolution. This was also the title of one essay in the book. Return of the Primitive was published in 1999, and is an expanded edition of The New Left, edited with an introduction by Peter Schwartz. It includes Schwartz?s essay “The Return of the Primitive,” which he used for the title of the new edition.

TOC Summer Seminar Update

Program information and secure, online registration are now available for TOC’s 15th annual Summer Seminar.
This year’s seminar is titled “Objectivism in Theory and Practice” and will be held July 3-10, 2004 at the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
The week-long program is filled with many well-known names in Objectivism: David Kelley, Nathaniel Branden, Robert Bidinotto, Lindsay Perigo, Tibor Machan, Ed Hudgins, Douglas Rasmussen, Robert Poole, Stephen Hicks, Eric Mack, Mimi Gladstein, Michael Newberry, and many, many more.

Gary Hull Writes of Valentine's Day

ARI op-ed columnist Gary Hull has written an editorial exploring the nature of love from an Objectivist viewpoint. From his column:

The nature of love places certain demands on those who wish to enjoy it. You must regard yourself as worthy of being loved. Those who expect to be loved, not because they offer some positive value, but because they don’t ? i.e., those who demand love as altruistic duty ? are parasites. Someone who says “Love me just because I need it” seeks an unearned spiritual value ? in the same way that a thief seeks unearned wealth. To quote a famous line from The Fountainhead: “To say ‘I love you,’ one must know first how to say the ‘I.'”
Valentine’s Day ? with its colorful cards, mouth-watering chocolates and silky lingerie ? gives material form to this spiritual value. It is a moment for you to pause, to ignore the trivialities of life ? and to celebrate the selfish pleasure of being worthy of someone’s love and of having found someone worthy of yours.

Happy Valentine’s Day!

Salon.com on Ayn Rand Dating Service

Lynn Harris has written a Salon.com article about niche dating sites, which includes kind remarks about the Atlasphere and its denizens:

More and more sites now employ some sort of virtual velvet rope to screen out undesirables; others focus around hobbies, interests, tastes and lifestyles ? and not just dirty ones. These niche sites are more eclectic still than personals services devoted to specific ethnicities, religions, basic sexual preferences, or readers of the same online magazine.
Looking for fellow bikers? Why they’re right here. For doctors? Armchair astrologists? Raw foodies? Geeks? Fans of “Buffy,” “Smallville,” “Lord of the Rings,” “Star Trek”? Just a click away. People with pets can go toKissyKat.com, which is for single animal lovers willing to use a site called KissyKat.com.
There’s also ? my personal favorite ? the Ayn Rand Online Dating Service (part of the Rand-admirer community “the Atlasphere”), whose members, fans of Rand-flavor reason and rationality (and perhaps Objectivism), would totally win a rumble against the “metaphysically minded people” searching for their “twinflames” at Astral Hearts Metaphysical Personals.

Isn’t that the truth.

Adam Vinatieri Discusses Atlas Shrugged

Commitment is important in football, but not all players’ inspiration for excellence and commitment is instilled by the coach. Here’s a few words from Adam Vinatieri on his favorite book, Atlas Shrugged.

If you assume Vinatieri’s reading list begins and ends at Field & Stream, guess again. His favorite book is Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand. It is an epic novel about a society in mysterious decline, and about the death and rebirth of the human spirit. The book profoundly influenced Vinatieri’s feelings about the importance of pride in the work place.
“The book’s about commitment,” he says. “Whatever you do and whatever you’re going to put your name on, whatever you’re going to sign as your work, do it to be proud of what you’re doing. Do it the best you can and you’ll never be disappointed. You’ll never have to say, ‘What if I had tried a little harder?'”

From an NFL.com interview conducted by Vic Carruci. The column is titled “Kickin’ back with the Vinatieris.”

Bidinotto Lecturing on 'Guerrilla Activism'

Robert Bidinotto will be delivering a lecture in New York City on March 4th titled “Guerilla Activism: How One Individual Can Wage and Win Ideological Battles.”
From the announcement:

Thursday, March 4, 2004, 7:00 p.m.
The Shelburne Murray Hill Hotel
Ballroom, main floor
303 Lexington Avenue @ 37th St. (see map)
Free admission-no reservation necessary
Social change depends primarily upon the spread of new ideas. And spreading those ideas depends, in turn, upon effective persuasion. But how can one person be heard amid the din of millions of other voices clamoring for public attention? How can a single individual hope to compete with organized non-profits, well-heeled propagandists, slick politicians, and famous pundits? Does it take a lot of money and sophisticated resources? Or are there principles that anyone can apply to wage and win philosophical and political battles in the public arena?

See Bidinotto’s announcement for further details.